The ontological argument essay

Swatkowski is the most recent collection of papers on ontological arguments. Given a sufficiently generous conception of properties, and granted the acceptability of the underlying modal logic, the listed theorems do follow from the axioms.

But many philosophers are skeptical about the underlying assumption, as Leibniz describes it, "that this idea of the all-great or all-perfect The ontological argument essay is possible and implies no contradiction.

There are many kinds of parodies on Ontological Arguments. From 1 and 2. Here are some modest examples: Therefore, God necessarily exists in reality. A is an essence of x if and only if for every property B, x has B necessarily if and only if A entails B Definition 3: He stated that, although it may be accepted that it would be a greater achievement for a non-existent creator to create something than a creator who exists, there is no reason to assume that a non-existent creator would be a greater being.

God is that, than which nothing greater can be conceived. Among other journal articles, perhaps the most interesting are Prusswhich provides The ontological argument essay novel defence of the key possibility premise in modal ontological arguments, and Prusswhich kick-started recent discussion of higher-order ontological arguments.

As Kant puts the point: So the acceptability of axioms for modal logic depends on which of these uses we have in mind. It makes sense and is true to say that my future house will be a better one if it is insulated than if it is not insulated; but what could it mean to say that it will be a better house if it exists than if it does not?

Atheist Bertrand Russell said that it is much easier to say that the ontological argument is no good than it is to say exactly what is wrong with it! He proposed that, unless the coherence of a supremely perfect being could be demonstrated, the ontological argument fails. A Neoclassical Theistic Response, Cambridge: Perhaps it is worth adding here that there is fairly widespread consensus, even amongst theists, that no known ontological arguments for the existence of God are persuasive.

It was not intended to be serious; rather, its purpose was to illustrate the problems Gasking saw in the ontological argument. Hence, it is necessary that God exists. Otherwise put, Premise 2 asserts that we have a coherent idea of a being that instantiates every property that makes a being greater, other things being equal, than it would have been without that property such properties are also known as "great-making" properties.

If a property is positive, then its negation is not positive. Premise Hence the being than which no greater can be conceived exists in reality.

The ontological argument assumes the definition of God purported by classical theism: He considers examples of necessary propositions, such as "a triangle has three angles", and rejects the transfer of this logic to the existence of God.

Here is his argument for this important claim. On this line of analysis, then, it follows that it is logically impossible for a being to simultaneously instantiate omniscience and omnipotence.

Rather, as we saw above, Malcolm attempts to argue that there are only two possibilities with respect to the existence of an unlimited being: But suppose that we adopt neither of these avenues of potential criticism of the proof.

Anselm: Ontological Argument for God's Existence

Since there are only two possibilities with respect to W and one entails the impossibility of an unlimited being and the other entails the necessity of an unlimited being, it follows that the existence of an unlimited being is either logically necessary or logically impossible.

We could, for instance, distinguish between the properties which are encoded in an idea or concept, and the properties which are attributed in positive atomic beliefs which have that idea or concept as an ingredient. Classic and Contemporary Issues, Oxford: For no one who denies or doubts the existence of a being a greater than which is inconceivable, denies or doubts that if it did exist its nonexistence, either in reality or in the understanding, would be impossible.

Outline the Ontological Argument for the existence of God.

To say that a being necessarily exists is to say that it exists eternally in every logically possible world; such a being is not just, so to speak, indestructible in this world, but indestructible in every logically possible world - and this does seem, at first blush, to be a great-making property.

Oxford University Press, pp.Ontological Argument The Ontological argument is an argument for God’s existence based entirely on reason.

According to the argument, there is no need to wander around looking for physical evidence of the existence of God; we can easily work out that he exists just by thinking about it. Answer: The ontological argument is an argument based not on observation of the world (like the cosmological and teleological arguments) but rather on reason alone.

Specifically, the ontological argument reasons from the study of being (ontology). - The Ontological Argument The Ontological argument is a group of different philosophers arguments for the existence of God.

"Ontological" literally means talking about being and so in this case, that being is the existence or being of God. Ontological arguments contend that we can know that God exists in the same way that we know that 2 + 2 = 4: through reason alone.

In other words, they claim to show that God exists without ever consulting experience or observation. Anselm provided the first ontological argument for the existence of.

In conclusion, Anselm's logical a priori ontological argument is adequate for establishing the necessary existence of the Greatest Conceivable Being. The premises of Anselm's ontological argument were demonstrated to be sound when examined in the context of Anselm's definition of the Greatest Conceivable Being.

One of the most fascinating arguments for the existence of an all-perfect God is the ontological argument. While there are several different versions of the argument, all purport to show that it is self-contradictory to deny that there exists a greatest possible being.

Thus, on this general line of.

The ontological argument essay
Rated 0/5 based on 59 review